Threshold Concept – Transmission through Design

          Martin Creed. No. 1092 (2011)

“An Olympic marathon: the glow of a letter (…) passing from runner to runner, the heart of the message laying precisely in its transmission”. The glow of a letter, the transmission as the heart of the message… “ Regis Debray – Socialism a Life Cycle

British Design was borne out of a socialist context, a pursuit bought about by the drive of a craft based network of makers, to provide the people of modern day society a voice. Design of the 1900s presented itself as a vehicle of ‘mass’ communication for the common good, a voice for the people and alongside this, a reliable distribution of the ‘truth’, predominantly by messenger ( see Clarions – Fellowship is Life)

In his essay ‘Socialism a Life Cycle‘ Debray describes the versatile subculture of printers, typographers, librarians and publishers that turned out to be the cradle of socialism. and it is not hard to see that the not-named-yet heart of this “craft-based network” (as Debray himself describes it) as what later became widely known as ‘Graphic Design’.

‘Socialism a life cycle’ wins hands down the title of ‘best article’ about Graphic Design that I have read in a very long time, taking into consideration that Debray nowhere actually mentions the word ‘graphic design’. Throughout the article Debray demonstrates the many ways in which socialism grew from a particular ecosystem, an ecosystem consisting of printing and typography. Debray calls this system the ‘graphosphere’, and situates this sphere in the period running from 1448 to 1968. In Debray’s ‘graphosphere’, ideology is a product of Design, rather than Design being a product of ideology, which is an exhilarating revelation and definitely a defining ‘Threshold Concept’ Moment.

Debray’s enthusiasm throughout this essay is contaminating, revealing socialism as the political manifestation of Graphic Design, and modernism as the social manifestation of Graphic Design.

Design as presented in Darbys ‘graphosphere’, is not a tool to spread ideology; it is the other way around. To put this simply, Design doesn’t follow what people think, but what people think follows Design, and this is a very liberating proposition and clearly demonstrates the communicative potential and power of Design.

What this essay reveals is that all designers are ideology creators. every designer is ideological, whether he/she is aware of it or not.

140 years has passed since the rise of this left field movement and modern day Graphics Design now reigns superior, underpinning the visual identity that has come to be known as the world of commerce, economics & politics.

To enter into the design industry having grasped this key threshold concept, enables Designers to engage with this medium as a tool for social good, and with a thirst for continual enquiry. For those that have formed an understanding of design through an acknowledgement of its heritage, the world of advertising is a industry within which they can assist in the redesigning of ideologies and redistribution of ideas and wealth, akin to those key principles which first informed the growth of the discipline.

So for Graphics Design, I would propose that its key threshold concept would be to look to the past for the answers of today, and through so doing, come to a self realization of the relevance of, and power of design and the printed, distributed word. Words are a designers medium and that is a very powerful force to wield, and one which asserts more influence than to be used for those aesthetic considerations made on the side of a tetra pak or jiffy bag.

“The greatest modernizers inaugurate their career with a backward leap, and a renaissance proceeds through a return to the past, a recycling, and hence a revolution. Behind the ‘re’ of reformation, republic or revolution, there is a hand flicking through the pages of a book, from the end back to the beginning. Whereas the finger that pushes a button, fast-forwarding a tape or disc, will never pose a danger to the establishment”.        – Experimental Jetset

 

3 thoughts on “Threshold Concept – Transmission through Design

  1. PARADIGM SHIFTS

    Considering THRESHOLD CONCEPTS in pedagogy through the lens of Debray’s article is an interesting approach. It presents a paradigm shift in causative relationships. I would argue thought while design can and does change behavior, it can work the other way round too – necessity being the mother of invention so to speak. Perhaps there are multiple feedback loops informing the iterative process of creative process. Debray’s notion seems hugely empowering for designers and I would agree with you Jaygo that it is a fundamental Threshold Concept.

  2. Hi Jaygo, a very well considered and constructed piece on Threshold concepts within design. To me, design seems to be quite a broad subject with so many avenues, contexts, designers, artist and influential aspects to explore, I’d imagine it could be hard to pin point key moments in students’ understanding. In your explanation it seems the fundamental, key concepts for the students to grasp are around the shift in their own perspective of the context of design and typography and it’s history. Thank you for a very interesting and informative blog post.

  3. Hello Jaygo

    Thanks for your posts – and, as a historian, it has really cheered me up to hear you so forcefully suggesting that we look to the past to inform today’s practice!

    Zoe’s comment here, and the contrast between her suggested TC and yours, have made me wonder about the ‘size’ of TCs: hers is relatively focused, yours is very broad and to do with a whole disciplinary identity. Both seem very valid to me, but I wonder whether it might be possible to think of some TCs (the big, broad ones) as containing other, more specific ones?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*